Hi Benson, I will definitely create a copr repo for emacs-php-mode. Thank you for pinging me in the eask bug, I did the mock review over there.
Please let me know what else I can do in the eask related bugzilla. And I'll let you know when I have emacs-php-mode ready in copr. Thank you for your help On Sat, Feb 7, 2026 at 6:01 PM Benson Muite <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Ruslan, > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2026, at 8:05 AM, Ruslan Bekenev wrote: > > hi guys, > > I've been enjoying Fedora for a couple of years as a user and it would be > > nice if I can contribute back to the project I like. > > I slowly tried to get familiar with how fedora packaging is organised and > > what bugzilla rules are. > > Was even able to contribute to DNF5 source code with help of the > community > > members. > > > > I work as a software engineer and live in Melbourne. I'm primarily > > interested in web related tech, containerisation and Emacs but I would > > probably like other topics too. I just like computer stuff. > > > > On this note, I would like to resurrect emacs-php-mode [1] but this > package > > has a dependency called eask which has been packaged by Peter Oliver a > year > > ago and has been waiting for review since [2] (he has just updated it a > day > > ago - big big thanks). > > > > Can you make a copr repository with emacs-php-mode? > > > I wonder what is the common procedure to find a reviewer for a package > > (eask in this case). > > I also found this package-review-swap concept [3]. Very nice and I wish I > > could review someone's package in exchange of eask but I'm not in a > > packager group and I'm very much not confident in my packaging skills > atm. > > > > Also what would I need to do to join the packagers group. Do I need to > wait > > for eask review, try to resurrect emacs-php-mode and then try to look > for a > > sponsor? Is it the path or is there a better way? > > Happy to sponsor you. Let me know once you have a copr repository with > emacs-php-mode typically ask people to do a few mock package reviews, you > could also try to update some of the existing packages. > > > > > Thank you and nice to meet you all! > > > > 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552601 > > 2. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2333620 > > 3. > > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/about-the-package-review-swaps-category/86090 > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
