On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 12:01:23PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > In the case of the package upstreams being responsive I will work with > upstreams to fix (a bunch of fixes already in progress). If the > upstream is dead I will work with the Fedora maintainers to work out > what they wish to do. There's a couple of packages that I don't think > actually work with pandas 2.x, there were changes/deprecations in 2.x > to prepare for the 3.x release, even though they build against pandas > 2.3.x and I suspect those packages are broken and likely aren't used.
That sounds reasonable. > > Has compat been tested in Copr or such? Do we know how many packages > > will have problems? > > Yes, there's a pandas3 copr referenced in the change in the testing > section ;-) A bunch of the current broken should be fixed with the > pandas 3.0.1 release due this week. I will do another rebuild in copr > once that is tagged. I missed that, thanks. Quite a few packages fail, but I think we should do this regardless. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
