* Jerry James: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 12:47 AM Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> This code generation bug on aarch64: >> >> https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/14574 >> >> affects all the virt packages, and means we'll need another rebuild >> eventually. I'm not actually sure it's a bug in OCaml 5.4.1 since >> there are so few changes (link above) and none look like they could >> possibly be related. Could be something in binutils / toolchain? >> I need to take a closer look when I can reserve an aarch64 machine. >> >> But for the other packages we're nearly there (about 10 remaining to >> build) so it's on track to merge the side tag this morning. > > Thank you for doing this, Rich. I have to wonder if the aarch64 bug > is related to configuring with --enable-frame-pointers. Maybe that > wasn't such a great idea after all. If so, I'm sorry I talked you > into it.
The AArch64 ABI requires frame pointers, so I assume they have been there before. What's the effect of --enable-frame-pointers on AArch64? Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
