Good day, All my issues seem to be related to my external WineHQ package Problem 1: installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires libavcodec.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires libavcodec.so.61(LIBAVCODEC_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 - libavcodec-free-7.1.2-4.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 2: installed package winehq-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires wine-stable = 1:11.0.0-2.1, but none of the providers can be installed - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package winehq-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 - libavformat-free-7.1.2-4.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: problem with installed package - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires libavutil.so.59()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires libavutil.so.59(LIBAVUTIL_59)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavutil.so.59()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavutil.so.59(LIBAVUTIL_59)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavutil.so.59()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavutil.so.59(LIBAVUTIL_59)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libavutil-free-7.1.2-4.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 4: problem with installed package - installed package winehq-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires wine-stable = 1:11.0.0-2.1, but none of the providers can be installed - package winehq-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires wine-stable = 1:11.0.0-2.1, but none of the providers can be installed - package winehq-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires wine-stable = 1:10.0.0-1.1, but none of the providers can be installed - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 requires libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:10.0.0-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavformat.so.61()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wine-stable-1:11.0.0-2.1.x86_64 from WineHQ requires libavformat.so.61(LIBAVFORMAT_61)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package libavformat-free-7.1.2-4.fc43.x86_64 requires libbluray.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libbluray-1.3.4-11.fc43.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository You can try to add to command line: --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages
none of the standard packages appear to have an issue. Regards On Sat, 7 Mar 2026 at 23:41, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <[email protected]> wrote: > Upgraded to F44 yesterday evening. > > Had some minor issues the first time I tried upgrading, but after adding > "--enablerepo=*-testing" to the dnf command everything went fine, > so it was just a matter of some updates not making it to stable yet. > > Cheers, > Artur FI > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
