On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 1:13 AM Adam Williamson
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> python-paramiko was recently bumped to 4.0.0 then to 5.0.0. This has
> broken several dependent packages, as rmdepcheck discovered:
>
> Dependencies of other packages that would be BROKEN by the tested packages:
> package: azure-cli-2.85.0-1.fc45.noarch from 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f45-build/latest/x86_64
>   (python3.14dist(paramiko) < 4~~ with python3.14dist(paramiko) >= 2.0.8)
> package: python3-pyinfra-3.4.1-5.fc44.noarch from 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f45-build/latest/x86_64
>   (python3.14dist(paramiko) < 4~~ with python3.14dist(paramiko) >= 2.7)
> package: python3-spur-0.3.23-16.fc44.noarch from 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/f45-build/latest/x86_64
>   (python3.14dist(paramiko) < 4~~ with python3.14dist(paramiko) >= 1.13.1)
>
> CCing all relevant maintainers. Please be careful with this kind of
> major version bump, and check for dependencies. It would be best to
> treat it like an ABI break in a compiled library, I think.

Side note:
The changelog for 4.0.0 and 5.0.0 does seem mention quite a few
backwards incompatible / behaviour changes:
https://www.paramiko.org/changelog.html

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to