On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 11:35:02AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> The package libieee1284
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258654
> 
> has a licensing issue for more than a year. I contacted Tim (current package
> mainatiner) and he has no plan to fix this issue.
> 
> As a consequence I am going to retire this package by the end of this week.

This feels like an unnecessary action for this specific situation IMHO.

90% of the file is wrapped in a #ifdef __KERNEL__, so is not included
in the Fedora build of this package and thus irrelevant for license
compatibility.

The bits that are relevant are the constants and there's a case to
be made that this portion of the header can be considered non-
copyrightable content, regardless of the license header statement.

So while I agree with the view that   GFDL-1.1-or-later not be used
for code in Fedora, I don't think that's a problem in this specific
case and doesn't warrant package removal.

Regardless as a package in Fedora for 20+ years, it should be allowed
to be a grandfathered in under previous Fedora license rules IMHO.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com       ~~        https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org          ~~          https://entangle-photo.org :|
|: https://pixelfed.art/berrange   ~~    https://fstop138.berrange.com :|

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to