You did not hear about SPDX for long time and you must be eager to hear a recent news. So here they are:
* There is a new CI test 'license-validate` that is run for **every** PR at src.fedoraproject.org. It checks if your `License` tag is valid. This should help you catch typos (e.g., "GPLv2.0-or-later", "BSD 2-Clause"). You can see the example of the run here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mbedtls/pull-request/12
* I updated the burn-down chart: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?gid=0#gid=0 There are 3 packages that are not SPDX complient. I opened PR for one them. The remaining 2 have open issue at fedora-license-data (lazarus, webkitgtk).
* There are still 1458 packages that contains LicenseRef-Callaway-* and need to be changed to proper license ID - see https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/#_updating_callaway_umbrella_names for documentation. The list of affected packages can be find here: https://github.com/fedora-copr/license-validate/blob/main/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt
* Our main focus is on licenses of linux-firmware that is ... complicated * The license of tegrarcm was identified as not allowed in Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2477792 * I released new version of `fedora-license-data` with 7 new licenses. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
