On Sun 2026-05-24 22:32 , Omair Majid wrote: > Hi, > > (Re-sending with fixed CC, sorry) > > Jonathan Wakely <[email protected]> writes: > > > Has something changed in rpminspect recently? I built a new dejagnu > > package and it's failing rpminspect: > > https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/d6ffbc34-995f-47a5-b41a-87b5ff33be0d/ > > > The error is: > > "/usr/share/dejagnu/remote.exp is not a valid sh script on noarch" > > > > and ... well, that's true. It's not a sh script at all. It's not > > executable, it doesn't have a shebang, it doesn't end in .sh ... why > > is rpminspect even looking at it? > > I suspect this is the reason why: > https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect/pull/1412 > > rpminspect sees that the remote.exp file has a mime-type beginning with > `text/`, then sees that it contains `exec sh...` so the heuristic it > uses concludes that the script itself is an `sh` script. > > > A build a few weeks ago didn't have this problem. > > Fedora's CI was using a stale version of rpmisnpect for a while, so > maybe that's why this started showing up now?
The last working RPMInspect version is 2.2-1.1.202605131544git7d0 First broken one seems to be 2.2-1.1.202605141747git545 . This imho points the finger to the following commit https://github.com/rpminspect/rpminspect/commit/545d62d4387240acc3326145b4b9c6fff23f05be I've notified dcantrell (along with some rough AI generated patch suggestion). Martin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
