On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 8:01 AM Adam Williamson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2026-05-16 at 01:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 16. 05. 26 0:53, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > You're trying to install packages from different releases which contain > > > the > > > same files. > > > > Actually both protobuf3 and protobuf version 3 are from the same release. I > > believe this is an intermediate state of things, but nevertheless, there > > was no > > need to push protobuf3 to rawhide *before* protobuf was updated to 4+. It > > just > > created a slight mess. > > > > Here is a PR to *at least* add explicit RPM Conflicts: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf3/pull-request/2 > > This broke FEX in the latest Rawhide: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=145499081 > > DEBUG util.py:461: Running transaction > DEBUG util.py:461: Transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. > DEBUG util.py:461: Warning: skipped OpenPGP checks for 765 packages from > repository: b9a5d2c81d344e05a3951519fd9f44db > DEBUG util.py:461: - file /usr/lib64/libprotobuf.so.30.0.6 conflicts > between attempted installs of protobuf3-3.19.6-58.fc45.x86_64 and > protobuf-3.19.6-20.fc44.x86_64
This looks like an implcit file conflict, i.e. not caused by the explicit Conflicts added in the PR above (and potentially even fixed by it)? Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
