On Mon, Jun 1, 2026, at 2:53 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 5/30/26 2:28 AM, Maxwell G wrote:
>> On 5/27/26 4:15 AM, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce wrote:
>>> == Detailed Description ==
>>> Update RPM to the upcoming 6.1 release for various improvements across
>>> the board. Some noteworthy items include bringing back NSS support for
>>> user/group lookups, new man pages, enhancements to the macro
>>> subsystem, and scriptlet running optimization on Linux.
>> I've said this elsewhere, but the new manpages are very nice. Thanks for 
>> working on them.
>
> A lot of effort has gone into them, so that's very nice to hear :)
>
>> 
>> Is the plan to switch to rpm format v6 as part of this Change or are we 
>> keeping the downstream patch to default to producing v4 packages for now?
>
> Switching to v6 format is a system-wide change of its own. I should get 
> around to filing one... So no, not a part of this change.
>

Is this is blocked by how signing works? Right now the RPMs are sent to the 
signing server to run rpmsign, and the server runs on RHEL 9 (so RPM v4.16). I 
assume signing needs to happen on at least 6.0?

If https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4218 makes it into RPM 
6.1 we could move to the new signing server where rpmsign runs on the client 
and can be Fedora, but it seems unlikely to me that all that can be deployed 
before the mass rebuild, so it'd need to target at a minimum Fedora 46.

- Jeremy
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to