Dne 06. 07. 26 v 23:16 Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
On Mon, Jul 6, 2026 at 11:05 PM Adam Williamson <[email protected]> wrote:Hi folks!I want to formally propose an idea that has been kicked around a bit informally lately: gating all stable release updates on the relatively new rmdepcheck reverse dependency static checker. This would include Fedora and EPEL updates.... you have my bow! ... and my axe! In general I think this is a good idea, and I would also think it would be a good idea for rawhide and branched.
+1 including Rawhide / Branched Vít
Failures could always be waived, and in case of "soname bump rebuild that is incomplete because something doesn't build" that would be a perfectly good reason to do so - and it would make it explicit that the packager who waived the failures took responsibility for that breakage - and provide documentation for it alongside the update. That said, stable releases and EPEL is likely less controversial, so starting with that sounds good too. And while I kind of agree that the Change process does not seem to be *great* fit for this, but similar changes *have* gone through the Change process before (like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GatingRawhidePackages ). Should a system-wide change (lower case intentional) like this require at least *some* kind of signoff from FESCo? Fabio
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
