On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 5:02 PM Mikel Olasagasti <[email protected]> wrote: >
(snip) In general I'm in favor of having consistent naming. > * For packages like rust-monitord-exporter, Rust packaging guidelines might > conflict with a general decision here. What is the best way to handle this? This should not be a problem. The "rust-*" prefix only applies to the *source RPM*, the actual built RPM is named just "monitord-exporter". There is no restriction (other than the generic Naming Guidelines) on the name of the RPMs built from that source package. The default is the name of the crate (i.e. the name of the source package without the "rust-" prefix), but this is not mandatory. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
