On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 12:03 PM Peter Pentchev <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 11:50:01AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > [snip] > > And calling it %openpgpverify is just nonsense. *If* I were to accept > > a rename of the macro, I would *only* reasonably consider %pgpverify, > > since that's the name of the format. > > Um. No? > > PGP was the name of a specific implementation that, at some point, > became commercial and trademark-protected. Also, it was PGP Inc. > themselves that proposed the OpenPGP name for the standard :) > > The standard itself has always been called OpenPGP. >
Sure, but that's not the name of the *format*. It's still PGP. OpenPGP is the standard that describes the PGP format. Anyway, that detail doesn't matter for my larger point. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
