On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 at 17:17, Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 08:37:30AM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > Hello team, > > > > As per guide defined on > > > > docs.fedoraproject.org > > > > Making sure you're not a bot! <#> > > > > 🔗 > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_exceptions > > > > <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_exceptions> > > > > > > we would like to get an exemption for f45-backgrounds needed for Fedora 45 > > This is already the case?, > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_exceptions > > https://forge.fedoraproject.org/packaging/guidelines/issues/1479 > > So, my reading is that fNN-backgrounds has a perm exception and does not > need to keep asking every cycle. ;)
Also reading this it looks to me like it's just requesting a new package which isn't blocked at any point in the process anyway, it's when it needs to be updated for the release and we're in freeze. The base package with holding images, or even no images, could be packaged long before we get to this stage in the development process with initial images added closer to branch time etc. I'm at a loss why this is always a problem every cycle. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
