On Fri, 2026-07-24 at 08:59 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 7:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Would the proposed AdamW's rpdepcheck help here? > > No, because the compatibility package introduced would have masked it. > That's only an install check, not a build check.
Yep, indeed - rmdepcheck passed on this update, as Neal says, due to the compat package. Additionally, I'm not proposing to gate Rawhide or Branched on rmdepcheck yet. I feel that "nothing may fail rmdepcheck" is maybe too strict of a rule for Rawhide/Branched. My plan for Rawhide/Branched has always been a more complex rule: "no Rawhide/Branched update may break the dependencies of any compose-critical package", where "compose- critical package" means "anything we need to run a successful compose". I've been working towards this for a while - I got the script for figuring out the compose-critical package set landed recently[0] and am now working on having Bodhi expose it[1] so rmdepcheck pipelines can consume it and we can, somehow, distinguish between "breaks something in CCP" and "doesn't break something in CCP" cases. [0] https://forge.fedoraproject.org/releng/tooling/pulls/13039 [1] https://github.com/AdamWill/bodhi/commits/ccp-import/ -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @[email protected] https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
