Hi!
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 11:39:02AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz via devel wrote:
W dniu 28.08.2026 o 15:07, Tobias Girstmair pisze:
I'm currently in the process of packaging vim-classic[1]
I have one serious question: What is 'vim-classic'?
an AI free fork of vim 8, but that feels a bit reductive. vim-classic
considers vim "done" - i.e., a piece of software that should mostly need
occasional bugfixes and less new features.
or in their own words: "Vim Classic is a fork of Vim 8.x for long-term
maintenance, providing a stable, dependable editor — maintained entirely
by humans."
Your spec file does not mention it in description, URL points to
unreachable domain.
argh, thanks. https://vim-classic.org/ works, but there are no RRs for
www. the descriptions need a rewrite, the current ones are 1:1 from
vim.spec.
And while you do a new package, your spec file has a lot of "if fedora
XY" checks from vim.spec - you probably should clean them up before
reviews.
These must have been inherited from vim.spec - thanks, good thing to
point out. you say 'a lot of' but I only found 1, gating `BuildRequires:
glibc-gconv-extra`; that can probably go away. what am i not seeing?
tobi
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
