On 02/07/2011 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Iain Arnell [03/02/2011 09:31] : >> >> I agree. Marcela's proposal is fine in principle, but unlikely to >> achieve much in practice. > > I have to admit this is my conclusion as well. > >> On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Howarth<p...@city-fan.org> wrote: >> >>> So overall I'm in favour of using the F-15 set of paths (assuming the >>> typos are fixed) but sticking with the vendor directories for everything >>> apart from the perl core. >> >> +1 to that. > > Add my +1 to the list.
Then you are likely able to explain why you want to see this implemented? I fail to see _any_ advantage this approach provides, but consider it to provide only regressons what Fedora 14 had. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
