* Benjamin Beasley: > On the other hand, if this change is less about packages that > currently can’t use LTO and more about trying to save build time for > packages that already successfully build with fat LTO objects, then > how much builder time can be saved? And what, if any, effect on the > performance of the compiled programs can be expected? If this is a > compile-time/runtime performance tradeoff, it’s hard to make an > informed decision without knowing what is being traded for what.
Assuming this is about not using -ffat-lto-objects with GCC, there should not be a change in generated machine code as a result of this. It just drops non-LTO code generation that we currently discard anyway. ThinLTO in Clang is completely different. Thanks, Florian -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
