On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 11:49 AM Milan Bouchet-Valat via devel
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I must have missed this PR. Unfortunately, as reported by CI on the 
> PR, Julia FTBFS anyway for other reasons. This package is very hard to 
> maintain as the version working in one Fedora version usually fails to build 
> on the next version due to too recent libraries or compilers, and getting the 
> latest Julia version to pass its tests requires a lot of detective work. I 
> recently tried in Rawhide and got an obscure segfault.
>
> To be honest I've been considering retiring the package in favor of simply 
> packaging the juliaup installer, which downloads upstream binaries. But some 
> packages which depend on Julia wouldn't be able to build with Julia support 
> then. I wouldn't mind some help...

Hi!

Thanks for the response. I understand that julia is a bit messy :(
I started to package juliaup but ultimately gave up on it since zero
people were interested and I wouldn't even have used it myself.
If you'd like to restart that effort, feel free to drop by in the
#rust:fedoraproject.org room on Matrix.

Fabio
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to