On Wed, 7 Oct 2026 at 12:16, Miro Hrončok via devel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2026-10-01 20:18, Thorsten Leemhuis via devel wrote: > > I understand the reasons from your POV. And I don't care too much (even > > if what I write below might sound overly again a standalone perf; sorry > > for that), but I fail somewhat to see how Fedora benefits from the split. > > Fedora Python maintainer here. > > We would love to be able to rebuild perf for Python packaging changes without > the need to rebuild kernel (which we cannot rebuild ourselves, due to missing > signing permissions). Ever since pytohn3-perf has been included in the kernel > component, we need to treat that package specially and ping Justin to rebuild > it for us.
Is that really a major issue since most of the time rawhide kernels get an almost daily build to keep up with Linus's tree? -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
