On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 10:31:06AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I am not a change owner/dnf5 maintainer here, so it's likely up to them > what to do about this, but I wonder if it might be possible to keep > libmodulemd and move the modularity handling off to a dnf5 plugin that > uses it. Then you / interested parties could maintain libmodulemd and > that plugin and largely not impact other things?
Not a maintainer either, but … with all respect and love for the users of libmodulemd, I think it makes sense to simplify the basic installer stack. There is a (small) handful of users of modularity, but it's such a fringe feature at this point that it's not worth the complication in basic tooling. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
