It might cause confusion on where to file bug reports upstream, because at first glance if they just go off the name, a person will probably find the original project. IDK how many people actually dig into the build files to find what source we are pulling before filing a ticket. Is the primary still maintained?
On Mon, Nov 2, 2026 at 11:11 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for clarifying! But this still seems to fit the guidelines. There > is no direct rule on > naming packages of forks. As packages of forks and "normal" packages are > treated the same, whoever > takes the name first, has it. Very confusing situation indeed. But i think > it's permissible. > Cheers! > > -- > Damian Daniel <[email protected]> > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
