On Mon, 02.05.11 12:09, David Quigley (seli...@davequigley.com) wrote: > Merging the kernel patch without doing the > legwork for userspace first is a very bad idea. The kernel is what > mounts the FS under /selinux so if you have it mount under > /sys/fs/selinux instead without coordinating with the required usespace > changes you'll have a completely broken system. I'd say let Dan handle > when the right time to merge the kernel patch is since both him and the > tresys people will have to be involved with releasing new versions of > libselinux . Also Dan will have to work with some of the package > maintainers to cleanup and fix their packages as well. I'd really not > like it if I can't test new kernels with my labeled-nfs patches because > we merged an ABI breaking change into mainline without making sure > people can handle it first.
No, userspace mounts the fs to /selinux. If the kernel patch is merged (and it will, given that Dan okey'd it) this wil just create an empty directory in /sys/fs/selinux suitable as mount point. That's all. Whether this is actually used as mount point is left to userspace. Merging the kernel patch is pretty much risk-less. The transition to it can happen at a later point, slowly, at a pace defined by Dan. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
