On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 17:12 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:29:18AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 16:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > It's less functional than gdm, and by the time it's as functional as gdm > > > it'll be larger than gdm because it also has to be as functional as kdm. > > > So I don't see any great benefit. > > > > Which functions is it missing? > > Approximately anything that's been implemented in gdm since 2003. >
I wasn't asking my question for snarky purposes. I was curious. I don't think this response was terribly helpful nor excellent. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
