On 06/13/2011 06:10 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 06/13/2011 08:23 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: >> * Steve Clark [13/06/2011 14:04] : >>> Maybe Fedora should adhere to Linus's rule that we don't have regressions >>> that break users stuff. >> Linus has no such thing. Google the min/max incident and the amount of >> drivers >> that were removed from the kernel tree before 2.4.0's release if you want >> proof. >> >> Emmanuel >> > http://apcmag.com/linus_torvalds_on_regression_laziness_and_having_his_code_rejected.htm
This article doesn't really justify your point. Reading LKML would show you the reality. If you actually believe that any one person can stop kernel regressions, that is remarkably naive and avoiding regressions at the distribution level is many times more impossible because of the number of components. We can make reasonable attempts to avoid them. That's all. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
