Ric Wheeler <rwheeler <at> redhat.com> writes: > ... > Given that my family is from the hills of eastern > Kentucky, I also find the "hill billie" comment off putting. > ...
Ric, no offense ... injecting Kentucky hills was misguided ... I happened to visit the state few times and was impressed with how nice it looked ... and the girls ... and horses ... Wow ! :-) > ... > We will not push for btrfs as a default unless it is safe. > ... I have difficulty swallowing the fact that there are so many Red Hat, Oracle, and other famous technology names involved (officially or dev's private contributions) in development of BTRFS, and at the same time they practice such loosely approach to software development methodology. You can not manipulate an algorithm or disregard it in part without botching it as a whole, and at the same time be perceived as capable of handling BTRFS development ... I do understand that people contributing to BTRFS are of different ways of life ... but those that assume leading positions anywhere in its dev life cycle must be "up to snuff" (academically, technically, etc). Otherwise, you will produce a "Frankenstein" fs ! The stakes are high because the features are advanced, attractive, and compelling. JB -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
