On 07/28/2011 12:36 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: >> > >> I don't follow your thought here - if you have a bin64/ and a bin/ >> etc and you have your shell initscripts decide (e.g. using uname -m) >> which of those to include in your PATH I think it does work ... provided >> you have (obviously) both (all) populated with whats needed... > > But that is still going to be a convoluted mess. For those poor users who > then have access to arm, ia32, ppc64, s390x and x86_64, you suddenly need 5 > different ~/.local/bin directories ... And I've probably forgotten some > arches.
I concur - I voted against this proposal :-) - the arch stuff just reinforces why its not a good design whenever there are any binaries involved .. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
