Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 10:44 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> See attached.
> Looks fine to me. The only reason I have to dislike it is the
> temptation for people to inspect build logs as a proof of what flags a
> package was built with (since the only sane thing is to store that in
> the binary itself, which the tools team is working on). But for
> debugging build failures this is great.
What happens in packages using a (possibly old) autoconf script that
doesn't recognize --disable-silent-rules?
IMO it would be better to add this option to the %configure calls
in packages where it's actually an issue (which is surely a small
minority, unless Colin has got evidence to the contrary).
regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
