On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 23:17 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Nils Philippsen wrote: > > Legal question: is it better to put this in its own subpackage to be > > able to specify this individual license, or would GIMP better have > > "GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and (GPLv2 or GPLv3)" as its license? > > Not an actual answer to your question, but wouldn't the license of the PDF > plugin be GPLv3 only rather than (GPLv2 or GPLv3), considering that GIMP is > GPLv3+?
Yes, indeed it would. Thanks, Nils -- Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty n...@redhat.com nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
