On 18 September 2011 19:22, Panu Matilainen <pmati...@laiskiainen.org> wrote: > I'm talking about means of having all the rpm-related tools use the same > abstract dependency resolution algorithm though an API. Whether that is > /in/ rpm, or something that rpm itself /uses/ (and possibly further > exports via its own API) is not terribly relevant to that goal.
If rpm exposed a depsolve API, I would switch to it in a heartbeat. If it's C, it's good for me. If it's based around libsolv, then even better. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
