Am Dienstag, 27. September 2011, 19:46:08 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:13:46PM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Anyone want to review this one: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734531 > > > > I'm sure a lot of Fedora users are awaiting this update. > > Questions ... > > Are we going to obsolete these packages: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison213 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison227 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/unison What do you mean by obsolete? Remove them? What's about the people using older releases?
> Instead of introducing yet another variation, can we somehow create a > single 'unison' package which covers all of the protocol variants? Something like a single multi-version unison package is possible? And is it really worth it? Sounds like a lot of work. > > Adding a new package every time upstream has a slight wobble over the > Unison protocol just seems wrong to me, and I'm sure there's got to be > a better way to package this. > > Did you look at what Debian are doing? Yeah, in each distribution they have only one package with the recent (in terms of debian) version. It's splitted up in unison and unison-gtk, though. I dont' like it. > > Rich. Greg -- I'm QUIETLY reading the latest issue of "BOWLING WORLD" while my wife and two children stand QUIETLY BY ...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
