On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote: > No, it's an attempt to explain a general concept and not to point the > finger at anyone. Because as soon as you provide specifics, someone will > feel offended, get defensive, and refuse to listen to the general > message.
I'd honestly like to know the specific usage case that is problematic for you. From the information so far presented I don't have a good understanding of what the network topology looks like nor how you expect traffic to be dynamically rerouted as your network node (in your terminology) becomes or is no longer available on a dynamic basis. -jef"If it helps, you could write up the specifics as an xml specification. Cuz, We all know that xml is the most impersonal form of communication as its designed to be read primarily by emotionless computers and not by people"spaleta -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
