On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:26:01PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:25:31AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.bad...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > IIRC from the discussion in FPC meetings, there should be a way to make > >> > yum > >> > upgrades work but you'd first have to boot up specially and run an > >> > initial > >> > upgrade script: > >> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum#Fedora_16_-.3E_Fedora_17 > >> > >> How does that work on headless devices? It doesn't seem to be well > >> tested. In fact there doesn't seem to be a way to be able to test it. > >> > > To test -- > > 1) install F16. > > 2) Run through procedure outlined on wiki (once the Feature Owners fill in > > the blanks) > > 3) Se if you then have a working F17 system > > The packages aren't in F-17 yet. See the contents of the f17-usrmove > tag in koji. > Ah -- I didn't understand that you wanted a method to test it *now*. Yep, if the work hasn't landed in rawhide, there is no way to test. That's pretty self explanatory.
When the feature owner has to land their changes so that they're testable is laid out in the policy: * New features must be feature complete or close enough to completion by Feature Freeze so that a majority of its functionality can be tested during the Alpha and Beta releases. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Milestones As you've been pointing out, this is a recipe for alpha slippage (and since recently we've been slipping all later milestones, a slip in alpha means a slip to the release) but I don't think the feature owners are technically doing anything wrong under the current policy :-( -Toshio
pgpZAk5PCnDED.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
