Alan Pevec (ape...@gmail.com) said: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > You don't mention the eisting 'Virtualization' group there, which > > is historically what people have installed when wanting a virtualization > > host. Admittedly this does include some desktop tools too. > > Right, I forgot to mention why existing "Virtualization" is not good > enough for this use-cases and it's exactly because it includes GUI > stuff which is not needed on the minimal hypervisor install. > > > If introducing a new group for the host, then I'd say we might want > > to also change the existing group to be solely the client mgmt tools > > "Virtualization Client" ? It gets even more fuzzy when you wonder > > where the new 'GNOME Boxes' app will live - probably under 'GNOME' > > desktop I presume ? > > Renaming current "Virtualization" to "Virtualization Client" makes sense. > I would put new Boxes into both Virt.Client and GNOME groups, list of > packages are not exclusive.
Got a patch for this? Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
