On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:02 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mar 21, 2012, at 9:17 AM, Peter Jones wrote: > > > We definitely want to keep using grubby instead of running grub2-mkconfig > > and > > clobbering whatever's in your config file every time. > > *shrug* I think grubby makes for an increasingly cluttered grub.cfg. > With the latest behavior I'm seeing with 2.00~beta2's grub2-mkconfig, > it cleans up after itself nicely. The grub.cfg pretty clearly > indicates it can be clobbered, by design.
yeah, I have to admit I get the feeling we're kind of swimming against the tide, now. I'm not sure it would be so terrible to just decide to go with the upstream design, run grub2-mkconfig any time grub2.cfg needs updating, and tell people to do customization in the /etc/grub.d stuff as upstream intends. The whole point of going with grub2 was to get closer to upstream and reduce our maintenance burden, right? grubby feels like a substantial chunk of maintenance burden too. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
