04.06.2012 22:26, Michael Schwendt написал:
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:36:29 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
Additionally have worth I try read carefully all docs about
provenpackager and such updates and have not found how deal with such
versions.
It's not provenpackager specific stuff, but found in the basic packaging
guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Using_the_.25.7B.3Fdist.7D_Tag
I had look in my packages and few others and found it was
updated many times in that way.
Just read the page linked above. There is no strict requirement to
apply this release versioning scheme for old branches. If newer branches
would always win RPM Version Comparison because their %version field
is _higher_, you can bump %release in older branches without risk.
In packages were was present subrelease
after %{?dist} - I increase it.
Should or must in next time I add it in any package even it does not
have it??
As the guidelines say: "Be careful with this!"
Thank you very much Michael. It's helpful.
But what still is not clear to me - if it secure, may it be applied to
all packages on update in stable releases? Or instead I should check if
increasing release do not break version sequence in branches - do that.
And only if it false, introduce subrelease like %{?dist}.1?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
