On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 01:12 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > #yum update mesa-libgbm > [...] > ---> Package mesa-libgbm.i686 0:8.1-0.5.fc18 will be updated > ---> Package mesa-libgbm.x86_64 0:8.1-0.5.fc18 will be updated > ---> Package mesa-libgbm.i686 0:8.1-0.6.fc18 will be an update > --> Processing Dependency: libudev.so.1(LIBUDEV_183) for package: > mesa-libgbm-8.1-0.6.fc18.i686 > --> Processing Dependency: libudev.so.1 for package: > mesa-libgbm-8.1-0.6.fc18.i686 > ---> Package mesa-libgbm.x86_64 0:8.1-0.6.fc18 will be an update > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package systemd.i686 0:185-2.fc18 will be installed > > After having had some funny issues in the past due to there being two > systemds (x86_64, i686) installed for some reason, something tells me > that it's a bad idea to proceed with the update. Or am I wrong?
Having two systemd packages installed isn't necessarily a problem, rpm's "color" concept on ELF objects should mean that x86_64 should win wherever the two packages' files collide, which should only be in /usr/*bin. It's still not the prettiest thing in the world, I admit; I'd be happier if there were a systemd-libs even if it were effectively not optional. But if there's not going to be a systemd-libs subpackage, any issues you do have with this scenario are systemd bugs. - ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
