On 9 October 2012 15:50, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:41:51PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> > If you want audit-like semantics with crashing if we cannot write, then
>> > use something else, not the journal. The journal is supposed to be
>> > robust and do the right thing so that you can leave it unnatteneded and
>> > whatever happens it didn't spill the disk or become unavailable. It's
>> > supposed to be "zero maintainance".
>>
>> So in those cases rsyslog would be required, but would be seen as a
>> post-install step.
>>
>> EG what you are looking at is building a GNOME-OS and for those sorts
>> of tablets, etc the journal is right for that. The other cases like at
>> a Hospital, trading firm or various .gov.XX then having rsyslog
>> installed with audit post would be the way to get the needed features.
>
> If so, this seems unfortunate, because the other features discussed (e.g.,
> trustable metadata) would be very welcome in these environments. Can't the
> enterprise have nice things?

Sorry I didn't mean to make that either/or. The enterprise gets the
journald but does not get to keep its contents unless there is a
program that sends it to say rsyslog.

-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it."
Linus Torvalds
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me."  —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to