On 11/26/2012 10:14 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote: > I came across what looks like a possible licensing issue with LibRaw and > applications that link to it. I am not totally sure that there is a problem, > but I have enough reason to have doubts. I welcome any clarifications and > advice. > > LibRaw's License tag was changed from "LGPLv2 or CDDL" to GPLv3 when the two > demosaic packs were added [1]. One of the demosaic packs is GPLv2+ and the > other is GPLv3+. > > However, http://www.libraw.org/ mentions LibRaw's license as GPLv2+, while > the source files continue to claim that they are under LGPLv2 or CDDL. > > Shotwell, which uses LibRaw, is LGPLv2+. By my reading of the compatibility > matrix [2], it means that Shotwell is now effectively GPLv3.
If it's linked with a GPLv3+ demosaic pack, it must be GPLv3+. > If that is the case, then has Yorba been notified of that? I doubt they would > suddenly want their code to become GPLv3 instead of LGPLv2+. Why does it matter? Their code hasn't changed, and has not become GPLv3. The package is GPLv3+. Andrew. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
