On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Jon Masters <j...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/05/2012 02:39 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> I can't make the meeting. It conflicts with the Board meeting. >> >>> Current items on the agenda: >>> >>> 1) Current Problem packages >>> >>> 2) F18 ARM VFAD - additional feedback, blockers? >>> >>> 3) Ownership of non-release blocking images (Beagleboard XM, etc) >> >> Who decided this was a non blocker? It was my understanding it was a >> blocker. It was supported in F17 and it was discussed that it wasn't a >> blocker for alpha. > > Paul is going to start a thread specifically on some of these additional > targets, seeking volunteers to support them. I could go either way on > the BB-XM. It's not too much hassle to test but it's also yet another > target and so far there don't seem to be people yelling yet.
I've had a number of people complain directly to me. I'm disappointed when we've discussed this as a group previously as a worthwhile thing for us to support and then a single decision seems to have been made behind the scenes to drop it. >>> 4) aarch64 update >>> >>> 5) Your topic hereh >> >> koji updates. I've still not heard any progress on the repos issues. A >> ticket was filed in the tracker. > > Hopefully we will get an update. It seems rebuilding some of the repos, > in tandem with the hdf5 soname bump rebuild somewhere along the lines > has resulted in a buildroot with a working compiler for netcdf. I can't > reproduce the problems we had with that in either a local v5 or v7, or a > mock v5 or v7, and a scratch build succeeded earlier as well of the -3 > release, which is what we need to end up with anyway. That appears to be a separate discussion to the issue I've mentioned above, is it? I'm not sure how it links to the koji issues, can you explain more. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
