On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:10:45 -0800 Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hm, I missed the point that the exception is for lib/foo vs.
> %libdir/foo (arched vs. non-arched). That makes it a more complex
> three-way argument. But I think the point about libexecdir being
> pointless still stands.
IMHO, libexecdir is not part of this at all... we already have:
"If upstream's build scripts support the use of %{_libexecdir} then
that is the most appropriate place to configure it (eg. passing
--libexecdir=%{libexecdir}/%{name} to autotools configure). If
upstream's build scripts do not support that, %{_libdir}/%{name} is a
valid second choice. "
It's all about the choice of lib instead of %{_libdir}.
I'd love to see this changed/fixed down the road, but it's a lot of
documentation and moving around.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
