On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 05:38:17AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > I disagree. systemd simply hasn't taken libexecdir into account in > its design and now is trying to propagate their oversight/mistake as > "standard" instead of making their works compliant with _our_ > distro's demands.
libexec doesn't exist in any published version of the FHS, and even the draft of 3.0 makes it clear that it's optional. Our use of libexec is non-standard, not systemd's use of lib. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
