On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:42:14AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> However, you also miss my point. Adam's message was saying that the
> guidelines forced people to use libexecdir and then went on to point out the
> drawbacks of forcing specifically libexecdir on upstreams that didn't have
> that
> coded in. So, as I said, in that context it's meaningless to bring up
> arguments that are only addressed to libexecdir because %{_libdir} is an
> alternative.
I think you miss my point. Where consistency across architectures is
desired, %{_libdir} isn't an option, so in the absence of an exception
the guidelines force people to use libexec.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
