On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Marc Deop Argemí <m...@marcdeop.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 16 January 2013 12:18:19 Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689127 >> (performance problem with virtual machines) > > I must add that, in my experience, the performance is *bad* not only in > virtual machines but in the whole user experience (I've been using btrfs in > my /home partition for a while now and I'm sorry to say that it's really slow > compared to ext4). > > In my humble opinion, as of right now, btrfs is not yet ready to be used as > default > > Regards, > > Marc > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Yes, I'd veto btrfs as the default as well. I lost a huge chunk of data on a btrfs partition a while back, with *no* diagnostics, recovery tools, help from Google, etc. Screw speed - unless it's rock solid and *simple* to back up, maintain, diagnose and manage, I won't use it. -- Twitter: http://twitter.com/znmeb; Computational Journalism Publishers Workbench: http://znmeb.github.com/Computational-Journalism-Publishers-Workbench/ How the Hell can the lion sleep with all those people singing "A weem oh way!" at the top of their lungs? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
