On Tuesday, January 29, 2013, Olav Vitters wrote: > > >MATE developers actually have GNOME git accounts now.
I know that. >GNOME classic is not the same as a fallback mode. I am skeptical. > > > MATE did not have that much development, nor that many developers if you > compare it to the amount of work done between a GNOME 2.x release. Paid full time employees vs non paid hobbyists. >Could you reference the bugs that GNOME 3 has problems with systemd? >Because it works fine for me. You know how search RHBZ? > > > Is it really that scary for you guys to think about something else > besides > > Gnome 3 and KDE? > > > > Not enough support? Then step up and quit whining. You know how to help, > > Red Hat employees. Don't be selfish. This is Fedora not RHEL. This is a > > community based distribution not Red Hats playground. Please feel free to > > correct me if I'm wrong. > > I suggest you actually do some work instead of showing that you dislike > Red Hat employees. > Done. > Everyone loves to dance around the fact about what Fedora is or isn't. > > > > This isn't one persons decision and its not 2003. > > > > Get with the times. Your projects failed. Sure a lot of people like it. > > Then again a lot of people don't. And we wonder why there are less people > > using Fedora. > > You say "projects": which projects exactly? > > > And then we wonder why MATE and Cinnamon got the most press coverage in > > Fedora 18 and why there has been a huge user spike in the last 30 days. > It > > hasn't been because of systemd, Gnome 3.6, and Anaconda 18. You are on > > serious drugs if you believe that. > > >"serious drugs" > > >Quit with attacking people, then maybe people will actually listen. At > >the moment you are very vague and unspecific (e.g. bug references, not > >vague claims). The only think you make clear is that you're angry. Nobody has been listening for the last 3 years. Dan
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel