On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:22:00PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:32:12 +0000 >> Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:53:32AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> > > as legal has said we cannot pregenerate initramfses i think this >> > > should be a non-starter. >> > >> > We already ship several pre-generated initramfses. >> > >> >> that are built at kernel build time? the issue with building it at >> build time was making sure we knew exactly what sourcs we needed to >> ship to match all the binaries in the initramfs. the initramfs's we >> build and ship as part of teh install tree we know exactly what sources >> because they match what is in the release tree rather than what was in >> the buildroot at build time. > > Yeah ok that case is a problem.
Not really. We use a chroot for builds you can look at root.log to see which packages where present at buildtime so we know the sources that are needed. Does not really sound like a hard problem to me. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
