On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Matej Cepl <mc...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 2013-02-04, 19:52 GMT, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> > It's an outdated article and not much relevant to the current
> > discussion (you see, it says "the Symphony repository"...).
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > The Symphony code is like everything else in this respect: all
> > Symphony code that OpenOffice will choose to use will sooner or later
> > go to trunk and into a release, receiving the same paranoid attention
> > as the rest and a crystal clear license notice (the Apache 2 License
> > in this case) allowing anybody to use it.
>
> And then (and only then) there will be something released from IBM to
> the public. Until then my comment https://lwn.net/Articles/533402/
> stands and the discussion on that webpage is still pretty relevant.
>
> Best,
>
> Matěj
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>

At the same time, it's still totally irrelevant for the purpose of this
discussion.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to