On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Matej Cepl <mc...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 2013-02-04, 19:52 GMT, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > It's an outdated article and not much relevant to the current > > discussion (you see, it says "the Symphony repository"...). > > > > [...] > > > > The Symphony code is like everything else in this respect: all > > Symphony code that OpenOffice will choose to use will sooner or later > > go to trunk and into a release, receiving the same paranoid attention > > as the rest and a crystal clear license notice (the Apache 2 License > > in this case) allowing anybody to use it. > > And then (and only then) there will be something released from IBM to > the public. Until then my comment https://lwn.net/Articles/533402/ > stands and the discussion on that webpage is still pretty relevant. > > Best, > > Matěj > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
At the same time, it's still totally irrelevant for the purpose of this discussion.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel