Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > I wouldn't be surprised if whatever script is used to do the mass > > closings > > does a first pass generating the list of bugs that need closing, and > > then does > > a second pass closing them unconditionally. If someone changes the > > bug info > > between those two passes the script wouldn't notice. And figuring > > that there > > were probably thousand of bugs closed, it could very well take the > > script > > hours to run. > > Exactly. The script uses CSV generated from Bugzilla in one time but > as the script runs nearly for a day, conflicts can happen...
I seem to recall that I've seen Bugzilla detect and warn about conflicting concurrent changes. It would seem like a good idea to have the script use that mechanism. Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
