On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 22:48 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 05:01 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> > The appropriate place to discuss deliberate design decisions is a >> > forum where said decisions are made, ie not Bugzilla. >> >> Or a forum where said decisions can be overridden with a little more >> sanity, such as FESCo. > > I don't think it helps to start calling people's sanity into question. > You can debate the merits of the decision without going over the top.
I don't think he was calling anyone's sanity into question. Just saying FESCo would be a reasonable forum to discuss this if you are hoping to get the decision overridden. But I suppose the goal was really to get the developers to reconsider if there was enough push back in this "peer" forum. John -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
