On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Brendan Conoboy <b...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Please consider the idea that there is a useful middle ground "Primary" and
> "Secondary".
With the FESCo-member-as-elected-by-contributors hat on, there really
isn't a middle: The individual packagers are either responsible for
making their package work on ARM or not.
> It might be multidimensional:
>
> Primary Desktop---Secondary Desktop
> | |
> Primary Server----Secondary Server
... and with the
FESCo-member-interacting-with-rel-eng-and-qa-and-others hat on, the
idea of a "server-only ARM release" is fairly plausible to me.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
